Democracy in India Items for the global circulation.
Dalip Singh Wasan, Advocate,
101-C Vikas Colony, Patiala-147003 India.
Democracy in India.
Dalip Singh Wasan, Advocate,
Formerly Employment Officer PSE ll
E. mail. @ Yahoo dalipsinghwassan Co. In.
It is on record that we were under the Rajas, Maharajas, monarchs and then under the imperialists and we took centuries for the freedom of all those people who have never been interested in the welfare the population of their country. They had been dividing us, they tried to reduce us to poverty, they tried to see that we should be weak and always having something in our minds that we should have two time food and live that life and that 'they wanted us to ensure that we are serving them. And when we started this war of independence, even then, people who brought us ensure that we obtained after independence, we will implement here in India Rajai "Ram", the rule that was available during the life of Shri Ram Chandraji. People were saying this "Rajai Ram 'here in India are not explaining the definition of" Rajai Ram "and therefore the system of false slogan was introduced at this point even that had been adopted and followed by all those who wanted to reach the seats of power.
It is an act of what we achieved independence 15 August 1047 and only on achieving independence, we started working on the Constitution and it is on record that we have gathered all the good things in all the constitutions available at that time and we have also taken points depending on the situation and wrote the Indian Constitution which could be said that the Constitution's longest and most comprehensive in the world. We adopted this Constitution, January 26, 1950 and since then, our leaders have begun to pronounce that we are one of the largest democracy in the world and we also order that we maintain that democracy, despite all obstacles.
The democracy we have adopted, such as paper transactions, it is the people's government by the people and for the people, but if we go in depth, we find that this is not the government of the people. Someone a few that were available on the political scene took charge of the British government and then they have adopted all the methods of governance that have been adopted by the imperialists outgoing. This group, which took over the charge does not represent the people of India and, therefore, they can not say that they established the government of the people. They gave a right for the people of India and that this right was the right to vote and after each span of five years, people have been called to cast votes and then return to suffer for another term of five years or more. Given that people who have been elected does not belong to them, they never worked for the welfare of the people. They had been in establishing the rule of the family who was an old legacy. They have established here, the dictatorship of the party in India and during this period, we also noticed that there were people who settled here in India individual autocracy. These types of governments can not be called government of the people, because people occupying the seats of power were not the people of India.
We have noted that we have here in India could not establish a popular government, because politicians here in India were not from the people of India. They were people who took the seats of power to the imperialism. This was a separate category. Politicians who remained in the area were rich themselves or they have been nominated for the rich and p.
Posted on March 25, 2010.